Magic Cloud vs n8n, honestly
Different categories that overlap at the edges. Rows n8n wins are marked as such — the full 18-row matrix has every detail.
| Feature | n8n | Magic Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Workflow orchestrator | Backend platform AI agents build on |
| Pre-built integrations | n8n wins — 400+ core nodes, 1,000+ practical with community nodes | A handful of capability slots: HTTP, databases, email, files, browser, git, Python |
| Bespoke integrations | HTTP node and manual wiring, or a custom TypeScript node | Described in plain language, generated in seconds — live in production, no deploy |
| Database | External dependency — bring your own | Native: SQLite, PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server with generated CRUD |
| API creation | Webhook-triggered workflows | Real REST endpoints with OpenAPI specs and role gating |
| Frontend hosting | None | Static sites and SPAs on the same cloudlet |
| Code execution safety | Code node runs arbitrary JavaScript | Whitelisted slots — generated code structurally cannot exceed its permissions |
| Visual debugging | n8n wins — per-node execution view a non-developer can read | None — you read code and logs |
| License | Fair-code (Sustainable Use License), enterprise features separate | MIT, all of it |
| Community | n8n wins — massive ecosystem, templates, hiring pool | Small |